Start Carbon dating art forgery

Carbon dating art forgery

But the price inflation was almost certainly due to the painting’s inclusion in the London exhibition that served as the official stamp of approval, guaranteeing its authenticity, and its notoriety.

The pigments were also analyzed and are similar to those Leonardo used. This work has not been universally accepted the way has, and while the forensic results reassure that it is not a modern forgery, whether it’s by Leonardo is still a matter of opinion.

In 2015, I gave a talk on art forgery at the Albertina in Vienna.

The director told me that, not long before, renowned art forger Wolfgang Beltracchi had told the media that one of the Paul Klee works in the Albertina collection was actually his handiwork.

It was so unrecognizable that it had been sold in 1958 for just £45 GBP, its authorship long forgotten.

It would feature in a blockbuster 2011 Leonardo da Vinci exhibit at the National Gallery in London, and was sold in 2013 to Russian billionaire, Dmitry Rybolovlev, for $127.5 million, which, at something like a 283 million percent increase, may be a record.

It’s a clever move for an attention-hungry, convicted art forger to make.

It prompted a momentarily panicked check on the Klees in the collection, but it was quickly clear that they were all authentic.

Like this portrait, it looks Leonardo-ish, but just not as good. From a historical perspective, there are precious few Leonardo paintings extant: from 15 to 20, depending on which scholars you agree with, so any new Leonardo painting is big news. A copy after a lost Leonardo original, even by an established artist like Salai, is worth around 200 times less than the original would be. In 2010, Martin Kemp published a book that makes a very compelling case that the chalk drawing is the work of Leonardo—he even found a book in Warsaw with a page missing that matches the paper on which was drawn, and forensic test results suggest that the paper was made at least 250 years ago.